Process Map: How the Work Really Flows
Maps the process as it runs today, step by step, and shows how much of the elapsed time is work and how much is waiting.
See it in Brennock’s examplePrompts for Work · Pack 7 · 10 prompt templates
12 of 12 quality checks passed
The Operations & Process pack: 10 AI prompt templates for ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini
Fix the process, not just the symptoms. Describe how the work runs today, and the operations prompts map the process, write the SOP your team follows, find the bottleneck and the root cause of every failure, redesign the process, pick the right supplier on total cost and set the service levels and KPIs that keep the gains.
Free guide: How to write an SOP: template and example
Real exampleProcess map · Prompt 01
“Nobody can tell me where an order spends its two days.”
Order to delivery — current state
Benefits of the operations prompts
Four things the operations prompts do, from the first process map to the supplier review.
Every improvement starts from a dated baseline taken from real data, and no gain is claimed without the before and after figures.
The root cause prompt traces every failure to something the company can change: a step, a rule, a handoff or a tool. “Human error” is where the analysis starts, not where it stops.
The vendor evaluation prompt compares suppliers on price plus failures, rework, switching costs and the time spent managing them, not on price alone.
Each process step, measure and service level gets one named owner, a clear standard and a trigger for action.
What is in the pack
Each operations prompt works on its own. The prompt asks for what is needed and, in Claude, returns a finished Word or Excel file. Run the one you need, or run all ten in order.
Maps the process as it runs today, step by step, and shows how much of the elapsed time is work and how much is waiting.
See it in Brennock’s exampleWrites the procedure people follow: numbered steps, an owner and a standard for each, the checks, and what to do when something goes wrong.
See it in Brennock’s exampleMeasures cycle time, throughput and quality at each step, and finds the bottleneck that sets the output of the whole process.
See it in Brennock’s exampleFinds the few causes behind most failures, then traces each one to something in the process that can be changed.
See it in Brennock’s exampleLists every way each step can fail, scores severity, likelihood and detection, and fixes the highest risks before they happen.
See it in Brennock’s exampleDesigns the future-state process: waste removed, the bottleneck relieved, root causes fixed, with the time and cost saved.
See it in Brennock’s exampleFixes the scoring criteria before bids are opened, compares suppliers on total cost of ownership, and recommends one.
See it in Brennock’s exampleTurns the service the business needs into measured service levels, with credits when they are missed and a way out if they keep being missed.
See it in Brennock’s exampleScores the supplier against the SLA, calculates the credits owed, and agrees a corrective action plan with dates.
See it in Brennock’s exampleKeeps the gains: a few measures with owners and control limits, and a written response when a limit is breached.
See it in Brennock’s exampleWorked example
Brennock distributes medical consumables to 1,900 clinics: $64M in revenue and about 26,000 orders a month. In March 2026 it switched couriers to save 9% on its $4.6M delivery bill. Within two quarters on-time delivery fell from 96% to 81%, 6.2% of orders were shipped wrong, Brennock had issued $1.1M in credits, and 4 of its top 50 clinics, worth $2.3M a year, had moved to a competitor. The returns process had never been written down. Here is how the ten prompts take Brennock from that failure to a redesigned process, a new courier contract and a control plan, one step at a time.*
Prompt 01 · Map
What Brennock brought · COO
“Nobody can tell me where an order spends its two days.”
What the prompt returned
14 steps and 11 handoffs from order to delivery. Of 52 hours of lead time, 9 are work; the longest wait is 19 hours for the single 16:00 courier collection.
Takeaway: measure the waiting time between steps, not only the work, and start with the 19-hour wait for the single courier collection.
A SIPOC lists the suppliers, inputs, process steps, outputs and customers of a process on one page. A value stream map adds the time each step takes and the time spent waiting before it, so the delay can be located.
Prompt 02 · Map
What Brennock brought · Head of Quality
“Returns are handled by four people in four different ways. Nothing is written down.”
What the prompt returned
An 11-step returns procedure, each step with an owner and a standard. Credits issued within 3 working days, down from an average of 9.
Takeaway: write every step with one owner and a measurable standard, and give every exception a rule rather than leaving it to judgement.
A standard operating procedure (SOP) is the written, approved way a task is done, with numbered steps, owners and checks. A work instruction is the short version of the critical steps, used at the workstation.
Prompt 03 · Measure
What Brennock brought · Warehouse Manager
“Every station is busy all day. I need more people everywhere.”
What the prompt returned
One station is the bottleneck: pick verification handles 1,050 lines an hour against 1,300 at the 10:00-to-14:00 peak. First-pass yield is 93.8%.
Takeaway: add capacity only at the verification bottleneck, and only during the 10:00-to-14:00 peak.
The Theory of Constraints holds that the output of a process is set by its bottleneck, the step with the least capacity against demand. First-pass yield is the share of units completed correctly the first time, without rework.
Prompt 04 · Improve
What Brennock brought · Head of Quality
“It’s the new starters in the warehouse. They need more training.”
What the prompt returned
Three error types make up 76% of the 1,612 errors in September. The root causes are a manual override at verification and look-alike products stored side by side.
Takeaway: remove the manual override at verification and separate look-alike products before spending anything on training.
A Pareto analysis ranks causes by frequency to find the few that account for most failures. A fishbone diagram groups possible causes by category, and the 5 Whys asks why repeatedly until the answer is a cause in the process.
Prompt 05 · Improve
What Brennock brought · Head of Quality
“We lost 31 temperature-controlled parcels last quarter. What else is waiting to go wrong?”
What the prompt returned
23 failure modes scored. The top risk, 315, is a temperature-controlled parcel sent on Friday and delivered on Monday after its 48-hour cold pack has expired.
Takeaway: score every failure mode before it happens, and fix the top risks with rules and scans that make the error impossible, not with reminders.
Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) lists the ways each process step can fail and scores each on severity, occurrence and detection. Multiplied together, they give the risk priority number, used to decide which failures to prevent first.
Prompt 06 · Improve
What Brennock brought · COO
“Give me the process we should be running, and what it costs to get there.”
What the prompt returned
Lead time from 52 hours to 22. Four changes cost $100K a year and remove about $0.9M a year of error costs if the error rate falls to 1.5%.
Takeaway: fund the four changes as one redesign, and pilot it on one shift before rolling it out.
Lean process redesign removes the eight wastes from a process: transport, inventory, motion, waiting, overproduction, over-processing, defects and unused skills. The future-state map shows the process after the changes.
Prompt 07 · Source
What Brennock brought · CFO
“The March switch saved 9%. Why would we pay more now?”
What the prompt returned
On price the current courier is cheapest at $4.19M a year. On total cost of ownership it is the most expensive at $6.4M; the recommended bid is $4.8M.
Takeaway: fix the criteria and weights before opening bids, and compare suppliers on total cost of ownership, not on price.
Total cost of ownership (TCO) adds to a supplier’s price every other cost of using it: failures, rework, switching and management time. A weighted scorecard fixes the selection criteria and their weights before any bid is opened.
Prompt 08 · Source
What Brennock brought · Head of Procurement
“The March contract had no service levels. When deliveries failed, we had nothing to claim.”
What the prompt returned
Five service levels. On-time delivery 97%, measured from the courier’s scan against the promised date; 2% of the monthly charge credited per point missed, capped at 15%.
Takeaway: measure every service level from shared data, attach a credit that matters to the supplier, and write the exit terms before signing.
A service level agreement (SLA) defines the service a supplier must deliver as measured targets. A service credit is the reduction in the supplier’s charge when a target is missed.
Prompt 09 · Source
What Brennock brought · Head of Procurement
“First quarter with the new courier. They say it has gone well.”
What the prompt returned
On-time delivery 95.8% against 97%: $8.8K of credits owed for January. Late deliveries cluster on rural routes on Tuesdays.
Takeaway: claim every credit the contract allows, and tie each corrective action to the data pattern behind the miss.
A supplier performance review compares a supplier’s results with its contract, calculates what is owed for misses and agrees corrective actions. A quarterly business review (QBR) is the meeting where this is done.
Prompt 10 · Control
What Brennock brought · COO
“How do we make sure this doesn’t slip back in six months?”
What the prompt returned
Six KPIs, each with one owner. A daily error rate above 2.1%, the upper control limit, triggers a same-day review; errors have held at 1.3% for eight weeks.
Takeaway: give every measure an owner, control limits calculated from data, and a written response for when a limit is breached.
A control plan lists the measures that keep a process on standard, their limits and the response when a limit is breached. Statistical process control uses control charts to separate normal variation from a real change.
Three documents from Brennock’s ten prompts: the current-state map from prompt 01, the returns procedure from prompt 02, and the courier evaluation from prompt 07.
Order to delivery — current state
SIPOC and value stream summary, mapped on the warehouse floor
| Suppliers | Inputs | Process | Outputs | Customers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturers, courier | Clinic orders, stock, cold packs | Order received → released → picked → verified → packed → collected → delivered | Correct order, delivered next working day, in temperature | 1,900 clinics |
Lead time
Order received to delivery signed
52 hours
Work time
Time someone is working on the order
9 hours
Value-added share
9 ÷ 52
17%
| Finding | Evidence | Orders affected |
|---|---|---|
| Longest wait: 19 hours at the dock | Packed orders wait for the single 16:00 collection | 38% packed after the cut-off wait overnight |
| 14 steps, 11 handoffs | Customer service, warehouse, quality and courier | All orders |
| Address changes keyed in twice | Order system and courier portal | Every changed order |
Not yet confirmed
Waiting time before release to the warehouse was estimated, not measured. One day of timestamp sampling confirms it.
SOP-WH-014 — Customer returns
From return request received to credit issued · owner: Head of Quality
| # | Step | Owner | Standard |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Log the return request and issue a return number | Customer service | Same working day |
| 2 | Book the courier collection | Customer service | Collection within 2 working days |
| 3 | Receive the parcel and match it to the return number | Goods-in | Scanned on arrival |
| 4 | Record lot number and expiry date | Goods-in | Both fields complete before step 5 |
| 5 | Quarantine temperature-controlled items | Goods-in | Never restocked. No exceptions |
| 6 | Inspect other items and grade: restock, write off, return to manufacturer | Quality | Grade recorded against the return number |
| 7–9 | Restock, write off or return to manufacturer, and update stock | Warehouse | Stock updated the same day |
| 10 | Price the credit from the original invoice line | Finance | Invoice price, not current list price |
| 11 | Issue the credit and notify the clinic | Finance | Within 3 working days of receipt |
Measures
Working days from receipt to credit (target 3, baseline 9) and credits disputed by clinics, reviewed monthly by the Head of Quality.
Courier selection — vendor evaluation
Weights fixed before the bids were opened · three-year contract
| Criterion | Weight | Current courier | Bid B, former courier | Bid C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| On-time delivery | 30 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Cold-chain capability | 25 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| Total cost of ownership | 25 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Service and claims | 10 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| Systems integration | 10 | 4 | 5 | 2 |
| Weighted score, out of 100 | 33 | 78 | 82 |
Current courier
$4.19M price + $2.2M failure costs
$6.4M a year
Bid B
$4.6M price + $0.3M failure costs
$4.9M a year
Bid C
$4.4M price + $0.4M expected failure costs
$4.8M a year
Scores run from 1 to 5, weighted to 100. Conditions for the contract
Bid C scores lowest on systems integration and claims handling. Both go into the service level agreement in prompt 08 with dates.
Prompt output, formatted for this page. In Claude each prompt returns it as a finished Word or Excel file; other tools return the same content as text and tables. The figures come from whatever you paste in. Brennock Medical Supply is fictional, so every number here is ours to show you.
Yes. The SOP prompt writes the procedure your team follows: numbered steps, an owner and a standard for each, the checks, and what to do when something goes wrong. In Claude, the SOP comes back as a Word document.
Yes. The process mapping prompt maps the process as it runs today, step by step, and shows how much of the time is real work and how much is waiting.
Yes. The vendor evaluation prompt sets the scoring criteria before the bids are opened, compares suppliers on total cost and recommends one. Contract terms must be checked by a specialist; nothing here is legal advice.
ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. In Claude, every prompt ends with a finished Word or Excel file. ChatGPT and Gemini return the same content as text and tables.
Pack 7 · Operations & Process
* Brennock Medical Supply, its customers, suppliers and all figures on this page are fictional and used for illustration only. Output from these prompts depends on the information you supply and the AI tool you use. Contract and regulatory terms must be checked by a specialist; nothing here is legal advice.
Paste the pack’s documents into the AI PowerPoint generator, a separate product at $19, and Claude builds the board presentation as a real .pptx file with editable PowerPoint charts.
Below is Brennock’s executive summary: ten slides, one for each prompt’s output, unedited.
Brennock Medical Supply is fictional, so every number here is ours to show you. Generated in the NOVA house style.
Built in
as a real .pptx file with editable charts. Or take both generators together in the bundle, $25.
Nine packs for work, from strategy and finance to sales, HR and operations, each written to the same standard with its own worked example.