Prompt LibraryMarketing & Brand
Prompts for Work · Pack 3

Marketing & Brand
AI Prompt Templates

Ten AI prompt templates that run real brand work: what buyers actually want, what every competitor claims, the position, the message, the copy, then the brief. Below, one company is worked through all ten.

$15 · 10 prompt templates · lifetime updates
Get the pack — $15 Jump to the finale ↓

What’s inside

The 10 prompts in this pack

Run any prompt on its own, or run all ten in order. Each output feeds the next, building one Brand Brief.

The scenario

Verity: a good product that nobody can tell apart from five others

A compliance-training platform, $12M ARR, selling to mid-market companies. Customers rate it 4.6 out of 5 and renew. But five competitors promise almost exactly the same thing in almost the same words, the win rate has fallen from 31% to 19%, and sales is discounting to close. Here is how the ten prompts take that from a sameness problem to a position — one step at a time.

$12MARR
19%win rate, from 31%
+60%cost to acquire

Step by step

Input → what the prompt does → output

Ten prompts, in order. Each one's output becomes the next one's input, building a single running Brand Brief.

1
Research

Customer Insight Research (Jobs-to-Be-Done)

Works out what buyers are really trying to fix, and collects the exact words they use for it.

Jobs-to-be-Done · Voice of Customer · Buying Triggers
What Verity brought · Head of Marketing

“40 reviews, a quarter of sales calls, and our lost-deal notes.”

What the prompt returned

“The job is not training. It is not failing the next audit.”

What they say — “we got dinged on our training records”
What we say — “comprehensive compliance enablement”
Real competitor — the consultant hired after a failed audit
And — the spreadsheet they already have
The analysis · Verity’s buyers are paying to pass audits, not to train staff

Jobs-to-be-done (JTBD) is a method for identifying the result a buyer is trying to achieve, rather than the product category they buy. It often shows that the real competitors are not the obvious ones.

  • The job: Verity’s buyers want to avoid failing their next compliance audit. Training is only the means.
  • The real competitors: the consultant a company hires after a failed audit, at around $180K, and the spreadsheet it already uses at no cost, rather than the six other training platforms.
  • The buying trigger: budget becomes available after a specific event, such as an auditor finding a gap eleven days ago, not from a general need for compliance.

Takeaway: describe the product in the buyer’s own words, such as “we got dinged on our training records”, and time marketing to audit findings.

2
Research

Competitive Frame of Reference

Maps what every competitor claims, and finds the position nobody has taken.

Claim Map · Crowded Language · White Space
What Verity brought · Product marketing manager

“Here are six competitor homepages, pasted word for word.”

What the prompt returned

“Five of six promise the same thing. One claim is unoccupied.”

“Engaging” — 5 of 6 rivals
“Employees actually finish” — 5 of 6 rivals
“Mobile-first” — 4 of 6 rivals
Audit-ready evidence — nobody claims it
The analysis · Five of six competitors make the same claims, so buyers compare on price

A competitive frame of reference is the set of alternatives a buyer compares when choosing a supplier. When every company in that set uses the same phrases, the phrases no longer help the buyer decide, and price becomes the deciding factor.

  • Crowded claims: “engaging” and “employees actually finish” each appear on 5 of 6 competitor websites, and “mobile-first” on 4.
  • Open claim: no competitor claims audit-ready evidence. A usable claim must be true of Verity, unclaimed by competitors and important to buyers; only this one meets all three.
  • Supporting evidence: competitors’ one-star reviews repeat the same complaint: reporting fails when an auditor asks for it.

Takeaway: build Verity’s positioning on audit-ready evidence, and do not compete on low price, a position a competitor already holds.

3
Position

Segmentation, Targeting & Positioning

Picks the segment to win — and names the ones being given up.

STP · Segment Scoring · Positioning Statement
What Verity brought · CEO

“We sell to anyone who needs compliance training.”

What the prompt returned

“You are for the 200-to-800-person company that just failed an audit.”

Primary — regulated mid-market, post-audit finding
Secondary — regulated mid-market, pre-renewal
Giving up — enterprise — they build in-house
Giving up — under 50 employees — below the price floor
The analysis · Verity should target mid-sized companies that have just failed an audit

Segmentation, targeting and positioning (STP) is a three-step process: divide the market into groups with similar needs, choose the groups to serve, and define how the product should be seen by those groups. Positioning also means deciding which groups not to serve.

  • Target segment: regulated companies with 200 to 800 employees and an audit finding in the last twelve months. This group has a deadline and budget already allocated.
  • Segments given up: large enterprises, which build their own training, and companies under 50 employees, which cannot afford the product. Together they are 38% of current pipeline.
  • Positioning test: the first two positioning statements were rejected because a competitor could have used them unchanged.

Takeaway: focus sales and marketing on the post-audit segment, and accept giving up the 38% of pipeline that does not fit.

4
Position

Points of Parity & Points of Difference

Separates what gets you considered from what gets you chosen, then audits the proof.

POP / POD · Competitor Test · Proof Audit
What Verity brought · Head of Marketing

“Here are the nine things our homepage is proud of.”

What the prompt returned

“Five are parity. Three are noise. One is a real difference.”

Kept as a difference — audit-ready evidence — PROVEN
Kept as parity — security, mobile, integrations
Dropped — 5 claims every rival also makes
Proof gap — 1 pillar marked [NEEDS PROOF]
The analysis · Only one of Verity’s nine claims gives buyers a reason to choose it

Points of parity (POP) are features buyers expect from every supplier; points of difference (POD) are the benefits that make buyers choose one supplier over another. Parity features prevent rejection, but only points of difference win deals.

  • The competitor test: each claim is checked for whether a named competitor could make it truthfully. “Engaging content employees actually finish” fails.
  • The result: five claims are parity (such as security and integrations), three do not differentiate, and one, audit-ready evidence, is a real point of difference.
  • Proof audit: each remaining claim is marked PROVEN, CLAIMED or NEEDS PROOF. One claim still lacks evidence.

Takeaway: lead with the one point of difference, mention parity features briefly, and stop using the seven claims that do not differentiate.

5
Messaging

Value Proposition & Messaging Hierarchy

One message, three pillars, and the evidence beneath each.

Value Proposition · Messaging Hierarchy · Proof Ranking
What Verity brought · Head of Marketing

“Every team writes their own version of what we do.”

What the prompt returned

“One master message. Three pillars. Proof under two of them.”

Master message — the training that produces the evidence your auditor asks for
Pillar 1 — evidence by default — PROVEN
Pillar 2 — provable per person, per version — PROVEN
Pillar 3 — survives the follow-up — [NEEDS PROOF]
The analysis · Verity needs one message that every team uses

A value proposition states the main benefit a customer receives; a messaging hierarchy organises it into one main message, three supporting points and the proof for each. Without a hierarchy, each team describes the company differently.

  • Main message: training that produces the evidence your auditor asks for.
  • MECE supporting points: the three points are mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive: they do not overlap, and together they cover the whole message.
  • Proof ranking: measured results are the strongest proof, followed by named customers, third-party validation, demos and customer logos. The third point has no proof yet, so it is not used.

Takeaway: give every team the same hierarchy, and publish only the supporting points that have proof.

6
Messaging

Brand Identity, Voice & Tone

A voice defined as constraints, plus a pass that strips the tells of machine-written copy.

Voice Principles · Word List · AI-Phrase Review
What Verity brought · Copywriter

“Unlock seamless, engaging compliance enablement for the modern workforce.”

What the prompt returned

“Compliance training that hands your auditor the evidence, not a spreadsheet.”

Empty verb — “unlock”
Empty adjectives — “seamless”, “engaging”
Abstraction for a buyer — “the modern workforce”
Four tells — in eleven words
The analysis · Verity’s headline used four common signs of machine-written copy

Brand voice is the consistent style a company uses in all its writing. It is best defined as writing choices, such as plain over clever, because a writer can apply a choice to a sentence. A description such as “professional yet approachable” gives no direction.

  • The original headline: “Unlock seamless, engaging compliance enablement for the modern workforce.” It has an empty verb (unlock), empty adjectives (seamless, engaging) and a vague audience (the modern workforce).
  • Signs of AI-written copy: grand opening statements, verbs such as unlock and elevate, lists of three, “not just X, but Y” sentences, and closing lines that repeat the text.
  • The rewrite: “Compliance training that hands your auditor the evidence, not a spreadsheet.”

Takeaway: define the voice as writing choices, remove common AI phrases, and read each sentence aloud before publishing.

7
Campaign

Communication Objectives & Campaign Brief

Names what the audience believes today and what they must believe after.

Belief Shift · Communication Objective · Creative Brief
What Verity brought · Head of Marketing

“We need a campaign for Q3. Budget is $180K.”

What the prompt returned

“From ‘they are all the same’ to ‘the evidence is the product’.”

They believe now — compliance training is a box to tick
They must believe — the training is not the deliverable, the evidence is
Objective — comprehension, not awareness
Failure defined — before the campaign runs, not after
The analysis · Verity’s campaign must change how buyers see compliance training

A communication objective is the single change a campaign must create in its audience: awareness, comprehension, preference, trial or purchase. Campaigns that try to achieve all five usually achieve none.

  • Current belief: buyers think all compliance training vendors are the same.
  • Target belief: the evidence the training produces matters more than the training itself.
  • Objective: comprehension. Buyers already know Verity exists but do not understand how it differs, so the $180K budget should explain the difference, not increase visibility.

Takeaway: set one objective per campaign, and agree before launch which result would count as failure.

8
Campaign

Integrated Marketing Communications (IMC) Assets

The page, the ads, the email and the posts — every line traceable to a pillar.

Channel Copy · One-Variable Tests · Traceability Table
What Verity brought · Marketing manager

“Now write the landing page, the ads and the nurture sequence.”

What the prompt returned

“Every claim mapped to a pillar and its proof. Two rows blocked.”

Landing page — headline, three sections, proof block
Ad variants — each changes exactly one element
AI-findable — claim and evidence in adjacent sentences
Blocked — 2 rows marked [NEEDS PROOF]
The analysis · Every campaign claim must be linked to proof before it is published

Integrated marketing communications (IMC) means every channel, including the website, ads, email and social posts, delivers the same message. A traceability table links each headline and claim to its supporting point and its evidence.

  • Ad testing: each ad variant changes only one element, such as the headline or the call to action, so the result shows what caused the difference.
  • Held back: two claims had no proof and were not published.
  • AI search: buyers now ask assistants such as ChatGPT and Claude for recommendations, and these tools quote single sentences. Each claim is written as one complete sentence, with its evidence in the next.

Takeaway: check all content against the traceability table, and test one change at a time.

9
Measure

Customer Journey Analysis & A/B Test Design

Finds the one stage that is actually costing you, then designs a test that can fail.

Layered Diagnosis · Binding Constraint · Kill Criteria
What Verity brought · Head of Growth

“Traffic is fine, demos are fine, and revenue is down.”

What the prompt returned

“Credibility. Demo-to-opportunity fell 44% to 26%. $2.1M a quarter.”

Reach — not the constraint
Relevance — not the constraint
Comprehension — not the constraint
Credibility — THE BINDING CONSTRAINT
The analysis · Verity loses sales because buyers do not believe its main claim

Customer journey analysis examines each stage from first contact to purchase to find the binding constraint: the stage that limits results the most. The stages checked are reach, relevance, comprehension, credibility, friction and fit.

  • The constraint: credibility. Demo-to-opportunity conversion fell from 44% to 26% because the website offers no proof of Verity’s main claim.
  • The cost: $2.1M of pipeline lost every quarter.
  • Test design: the fix is tested with one change, a minimum improvement worth acting on, enough traffic for a reliable result, and stop criteria agreed before the test starts.

Takeaway: spend on proof, such as case studies and audit results, instead of on more traffic.

10
Guidelines

Brand Guidelines

The document anyone can follow without asking you.

Brand Guidelines · Brand Rules · Review Trigger
What Verity brought · Head of Marketing

“Every freelancer we hire writes something slightly off-brand.”

What the prompt returned

“Three pages. Who we are for, what we claim, and what we never say.”

Who it is for — and who it is deliberately not for
The one difference — with its proof attached
Never say — “engaging”, or any unproven claim
Review trigger — what makes this brief go stale
The analysis · Verity’s brand guidelines must fit on three pages

Brand guidelines are a short document that tells anyone creating content who the brand serves, what it claims and how it writes. Long strategy decks are rarely read by the freelancers and agencies who produce the work.

  • Content: the target customer and the customers it does not target, the point of difference with its proof, and the brand voice.
  • Brand rules: what the brand never says: “engaging”, any suggestion that a regulator approved the product, or a customer’s name without written permission.
  • Review triggers: events that require updating the brief, such as a competitor’s move, a new target segment or a product change.

Takeaway: give every writer the three-page brief and the list of banned claims before they start work.

The finale · what prompts 05, 07 and 10 produce

What Verity’s teams and agencies received

Three documents from Verity’s Brand Brief: the messaging hierarchy every team uses, the brief for the $180K Q3 campaign, and the brand guidelines given to every writer.

The training that produces the evidence your auditor asks for

One master message, three supporting points, and the proof beneath each

Verity · for every team
Publish only what is proven
Supporting pointProof status
Evidence by defaultPROVEN
Provable per person, per versionPROVEN
Survives the follow-up[NEEDS PROOF]
Proof, strongest first: measured results, named customers, third-party validation, demos, customer logos.

Q3 campaign: from “they are all the same” to “the evidence is the product”

Communication objective and creative brief

Verity · Q3
Budget $180K

Audience

Regulated companies with 200 to 800 employees and an audit finding in the last twelve months.

Objective

Comprehension, not awareness. Buyers already know Verity exists but do not understand how it differs.

They believe now

Compliance training is a box to tick, and every vendor is the same.

They must believe after

The training is not the deliverable. The evidence it produces is.

Master message: the training that produces the evidence your auditor asks for.
Failure test. The result that counts as failure is agreed and written down before the campaign runs, not after.

Verity brand guidelines

Three pages: who we are for, what we claim, and what we never say

Verity · for writers and agencies
Read before starting work

For

Regulated companies of 200 to 800 employees that have just had an audit finding.

Not for

Large enterprises, which build in-house, and companies under 50 employees, which are below the price floor.

The one difference

Audit-ready evidence. No competitor claims it, and it is proven.

Voice, in one example

Not “Unlock seamless, engaging compliance enablement for the modern workforce.” Instead: “Compliance training that hands your auditor the evidence, not a spreadsheet.”

Never say: “engaging”; any suggestion that a regulator approved the product; a customer’s name without written permission; any claim marked NEEDS PROOF.
Review triggers. A competitor’s move, a new target segment or a product change means this document is updated.

Prompt output, formatted for this page. The prompts return the same content as text and tables; the figures come from whatever you paste in. Verity is fictional, so every number here is ours to show you.

Get the Marketing & Brand pack

All 10 prompt templates with full copy-paste text and worked examples — a downloadable PDF plus a plain-text copy file. Lifetime updates.

$15 · 10 prompt templates

Instant download · lifetime updates

Get the pack — $15
Next step · the Presentation Generator

From the Brand Brief to a board deck

The pack ends with the documents above. The McKinsey-Grade PowerPoint Generator is a separate product, $19: paste the Brand Brief into it and it builds a board deck in Claude, as a real .pptx with native, editable charts.

Below is Verity’s, twelve slides, unedited.

Verity positioning deck, slide 1 of 12 Verity positioning deck, slide 2 of 12 Verity positioning deck, slide 3 of 12 Verity positioning deck, slide 4 of 12 Verity positioning deck, slide 5 of 12 Verity positioning deck, slide 6 of 12 Verity positioning deck, slide 7 of 12 Verity positioning deck, slide 8 of 12 Verity positioning deck, slide 9 of 12 Verity positioning deck, slide 10 of 12 Verity positioning deck, slide 11 of 12 Verity positioning deck, slide 12 of 12
1 / 12

Verity is a fictional company, so every number here is ours to show you. Generated in the NOVA house style.

Microsoft PowerPoint Want the deck built for you in one shot? The McKinsey-Grade PowerPoint Generator — $19

Built in Claude as a real .pptx with native, editable charts. Or take both generators together in the bundle, $25.

Back to The Prompt Library