Prompts for Work · Pack 3 · 10 prompt templates

12 of 12 quality checks passed

AI Prompts for Marketing: Positioning, Messaging and Campaigns

The Marketing & Brand pack: 10 AI prompt templates for ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini

Stand out from your competitors. Paste what your customers say and what your competitors claim, and the marketing prompts find what buyers really want, pick your position, write the message and the copy, and build the campaign brief and the brand guidelines.

  • Works with ChatGPT, Claude & Gemini
  • Instant download
  • No subscription
  • Lifetime updates

Free guide: How to write a positioning statement (STP)

Real exampleMessaging hierarchy · Prompt 05

“Every team writes their own version of what we do.”

The training that produces the evidence your auditor asks for

Master message
the training that produces the evidence your auditor asks for
Pillar 1
evidence by default — PROVEN
Pillar 2
provable per person, per version — PROVEN
Pillar 3
survives the follow-up — [NEEDS PROOF]
Verity · for every teamSee the finished files →

Benefits of the marketing prompts

What the Marketing AI Prompts Do for You

Four things the marketing prompts do, from customer research to the campaign copy.

Use your customers’ own words

The customer research prompt finds what buyers are really trying to fix, and collects the exact words they use, ready for your copy.

Find the position nobody has taken

The competitor prompt maps what every competitor claims, and the positioning prompt picks the segment to win and the difference you can prove.

Give every team one message

One core message, three supporting pillars and the evidence for each, so sales, the website and every agency say the same thing.

Write copy that does not sound like AI

The brand voice prompt sets clear rules for your tone and strips out the tells of machine-written copy from the page, the ads, the email and the posts.

Who the marketing prompts are for

  • Marketing managers and CMOs
  • Founders whose product sounds like every competitor
  • Product marketers writing positioning and messaging
  • Agencies writing briefs and campaign copy
  • Sales teams who need one clear story
  • Anyone writing brand guidelines

What is in the pack

10 Marketing Prompts: From Customer Research to Brand Guidelines

Each marketing prompt works on its own. The prompt asks for what is needed and, in Claude, returns a finished Word or Excel file. Run the one you need, or run all ten in order.

  1. ResearchPrompts 01–02
  2. PositionPrompts 03–04
  3. MessagingPrompts 05–06
  4. CampaignPrompts 07–08
  5. MeasurePrompts 09–09
  6. GuidelinesPrompts 10–10
01Research

Customer Research: What Buyers Really Want

Works out what buyers are really trying to fix, and collects the exact words they use for it.

Jobs-to-be-DoneVoice of CustomerBuying Triggers

See it in Verity’s example
02Research

Competitor Analysis: What Every Competitor Claims

Maps what every competitor claims, and finds the position nobody has taken.

Claim MapCrowded LanguageWhite Space

See it in Verity’s example
03Position

Target Market and Positioning

Picks the segment to win — and names the ones being given up.

STPSegment ScoringPositioning Statement

See it in Verity’s example
04Position

Points of Difference: Why Buyers Choose You

Separates what gets you considered from what gets you chosen, then audits the proof.

POP / PODCompetitor TestProof Audit

See it in Verity’s example
05Messaging

Value Proposition and Key Messages

One message, three pillars, and the evidence beneath each.

Value PropositionMessaging HierarchyProof Ranking

See it in Verity’s example
06Messaging

Brand Voice and Tone

A voice defined as constraints, plus a pass that strips the tells of machine-written copy.

Voice PrinciplesWord ListAI-Phrase Review

See it in Verity’s example
07Campaign

Marketing Campaign Brief

Names what the audience believes today and what they must believe after.

Belief ShiftCommunication ObjectiveCreative Brief

See it in Verity’s example
08Campaign

Campaign Copy: Landing Page, Ads, Email and Posts

The page, the ads, the email and the posts — every line traceable to a pillar.

Channel CopyOne-Variable TestsTraceability Table

See it in Verity’s example
09Measure

Customer Journey and A/B Test Plan

Finds the one stage that is actually costing you, then designs a test that can fail.

Layered DiagnosisBinding ConstraintKill Criteria

See it in Verity’s example

Worked example

Marketing Prompts Example: All 10 Prompts, Step by Step

Verity: a good product that nobody can tell apart from five others

A compliance-training platform, $12M ARR, selling to mid-market companies. Customers rate it 4.6 out of 5 and renew. But five competitors promise almost exactly the same thing in almost the same words, the win rate has fallen from 31% to 19%, and sales is discounting to close. Here is how the ten prompts take that from a sameness problem to a position — one step at a time.

$12MARR
19%win rate, from 31%
+60%cost to acquire

Prompt 01 · Research

Customer Research: How Verity Used It

What Verity brought · Head of Marketing

“40 reviews, a quarter of sales calls, and our lost-deal notes.”

What the prompt returned

“The job is not training. It is not failing the next audit.”

What they say
“we got dinged on our training records”
What we say
“comprehensive compliance enablement”
Real competitor
the consultant hired after a failed audit
And
the spreadsheet they already have

Takeaway: describe the product in the buyer’s own words, such as “we got dinged on our training records”, and time marketing to audit findings.

The analysis · Verity’s buyers are paying to pass audits, not to train staff

Jobs-to-be-done (JTBD) is a method for identifying the result a buyer is trying to achieve, rather than the product category they buy. It often shows that the real competitors are not the obvious ones.

  • The job: Verity’s buyers want to avoid failing their next compliance audit. Training is only the means.
  • The real competitors: the consultant a company hires after a failed audit, at around $180K, and the spreadsheet it already uses at no cost, rather than the six other training platforms.
  • The buying trigger: budget becomes available after a specific event, such as an auditor finding a gap eleven days ago, not from a general need for compliance.

Prompt 02 · Research

Competitor Analysis: How Verity Used It

What Verity brought · Product marketing manager

“Here are six competitor homepages, pasted word for word.”

What the prompt returned

“Five of six promise the same thing. One claim is unoccupied.”

“Engaging”
5 of 6 rivals
“Employees actually finish”
5 of 6 rivals
“Mobile-first”
4 of 6 rivals
Audit-ready evidence
nobody claims it

Takeaway: build Verity’s positioning on audit-ready evidence, and do not compete on low price, a position a competitor already holds.

The analysis · Five of six competitors make the same claims, so buyers compare on price

A competitive frame of reference is the set of alternatives a buyer compares when choosing a supplier. When every company in that set uses the same phrases, the phrases no longer help the buyer decide, and price becomes the deciding factor.

  • Crowded claims: “engaging” and “employees actually finish” each appear on 5 of 6 competitor websites, and “mobile-first” on 4.
  • Open claim: no competitor claims audit-ready evidence. A usable claim must be true of Verity, unclaimed by competitors and important to buyers; only this one meets all three.
  • Supporting evidence: competitors’ one-star reviews repeat the same complaint: reporting fails when an auditor asks for it.

Prompt 03 · Position

Target Market and Positioning: How Verity Used It

What Verity brought · CEO

“We sell to anyone who needs compliance training.”

What the prompt returned

“You are for the 200-to-800-person company that just failed an audit.”

Primary
regulated mid-market, post-audit finding
Secondary
regulated mid-market, pre-renewal
Giving up
enterprise — they build in-house
Giving up
under 50 employees — below the price floor

Takeaway: focus sales and marketing on the post-audit segment, and accept giving up the 38% of pipeline that does not fit.

The analysis · Verity should target mid-sized companies that have just failed an audit

Segmentation, targeting and positioning (STP) is a three-step process: divide the market into groups with similar needs, choose the groups to serve, and define how the product should be seen by those groups. Positioning also means deciding which groups not to serve.

  • Target segment: regulated companies with 200 to 800 employees and an audit finding in the last twelve months. This group has a deadline and budget already allocated.
  • Segments given up: large enterprises, which build their own training, and companies under 50 employees, which cannot afford the product. Together they are 38% of current pipeline.
  • Positioning test: the first two positioning statements were rejected because a competitor could have used them unchanged.

Prompt 04 · Position

Points of Difference: How Verity Used It

What Verity brought · Head of Marketing

“Here are the nine things our homepage is proud of.”

What the prompt returned

“Five are parity. Three are noise. One is a real difference.”

Kept as a difference
audit-ready evidence — PROVEN
Kept as parity
security, mobile, integrations
Dropped
5 claims every rival also makes
Proof gap
1 pillar marked [NEEDS PROOF]

Takeaway: lead with the one point of difference, mention parity features briefly, and stop using the seven claims that do not differentiate.

The analysis · Only one of Verity’s nine claims gives buyers a reason to choose it

Points of parity (POP) are features buyers expect from every supplier; points of difference (POD) are the benefits that make buyers choose one supplier over another. Parity features prevent rejection, but only points of difference win deals.

  • The competitor test: each claim is checked for whether a named competitor could make it truthfully. “Engaging content employees actually finish” fails.
  • The result: five claims are parity (such as security and integrations), three do not differentiate, and one, audit-ready evidence, is a real point of difference.
  • Proof audit: each remaining claim is marked PROVEN, CLAIMED or NEEDS PROOF. One claim still lacks evidence.

Prompt 05 · Messaging

Value Proposition and Key Messages: How Verity Used It

What Verity brought · Head of Marketing

“Every team writes their own version of what we do.”

What the prompt returned

“One master message. Three pillars. Proof under two of them.”

Master message
the training that produces the evidence your auditor asks for
Pillar 1
evidence by default — PROVEN
Pillar 2
provable per person, per version — PROVEN
Pillar 3
survives the follow-up — [NEEDS PROOF]

Takeaway: give every team the same hierarchy, and publish only the supporting points that have proof.

The analysis · Verity needs one message that every team uses

A value proposition states the main benefit a customer receives; a messaging hierarchy organises it into one main message, three supporting points and the proof for each. Without a hierarchy, each team describes the company differently.

  • Main message: training that produces the evidence your auditor asks for.
  • MECE supporting points: the three points are mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive: they do not overlap, and together they cover the whole message.
  • Proof ranking: measured results are the strongest proof, followed by named customers, third-party validation, demos and customer logos. The third point has no proof yet, so it is not used.

Prompt 06 · Messaging

Brand Voice and Tone: How Verity Used It

What Verity brought · Copywriter

“Unlock seamless, engaging compliance enablement for the modern workforce.”

What the prompt returned

“Compliance training that hands your auditor the evidence, not a spreadsheet.”

Empty verb
“unlock”
Empty adjectives
“seamless”, “engaging”
Abstraction for a buyer
“the modern workforce”
Four tells
in eleven words

Takeaway: define the voice as writing choices, remove common AI phrases, and read each sentence aloud before publishing.

The analysis · Verity’s headline used four common signs of machine-written copy

Brand voice is the consistent style a company uses in all its writing. It is best defined as writing choices, such as plain over clever, because a writer can apply a choice to a sentence. A description such as “professional yet approachable” gives no direction.

  • The original headline: “Unlock seamless, engaging compliance enablement for the modern workforce.” It has an empty verb (unlock), empty adjectives (seamless, engaging) and a vague audience (the modern workforce).
  • Signs of AI-written copy: grand opening statements, verbs such as unlock and elevate, lists of three, “not just X, but Y” sentences, and closing lines that repeat the text.
  • The rewrite: “Compliance training that hands your auditor the evidence, not a spreadsheet.”

Prompt 07 · Campaign

Marketing Campaign Brief: How Verity Used It

What Verity brought · Head of Marketing

“We need a campaign for Q3. Budget is $180K.”

What the prompt returned

“From ‘they are all the same’ to ‘the evidence is the product’.”

They believe now
compliance training is a box to tick
They must believe
the training is not the deliverable, the evidence is
Objective
comprehension, not awareness
Failure defined
before the campaign runs, not after

Takeaway: set one objective per campaign, and agree before launch which result would count as failure.

The analysis · Verity’s campaign must change how buyers see compliance training

A communication objective is the single change a campaign must create in its audience: awareness, comprehension, preference, trial or purchase. Campaigns that try to achieve all five usually achieve none.

  • Current belief: buyers think all compliance training vendors are the same.
  • Target belief: the evidence the training produces matters more than the training itself.
  • Objective: comprehension. Buyers already know Verity exists but do not understand how it differs, so the $180K budget should explain the difference, not increase visibility.

Prompt 08 · Campaign

Campaign Copy: How Verity Used It

What Verity brought · Marketing manager

“Now write the landing page, the ads and the nurture sequence.”

What the prompt returned

“Every claim mapped to a pillar and its proof. Two rows blocked.”

Landing page
headline, three sections, proof block
Ad variants
each changes exactly one element
AI-findable
claim and evidence in adjacent sentences
Blocked
2 rows marked [NEEDS PROOF]

Takeaway: check all content against the traceability table, and test one change at a time.

The analysis · Every campaign claim must be linked to proof before it is published

Integrated marketing communications (IMC) means every channel, including the website, ads, email and social posts, delivers the same message. A traceability table links each headline and claim to its supporting point and its evidence.

  • Ad testing: each ad variant changes only one element, such as the headline or the call to action, so the result shows what caused the difference.
  • Held back: two claims had no proof and were not published.
  • AI search: buyers now ask assistants such as ChatGPT and Claude for recommendations, and these tools quote single sentences. Each claim is written as one complete sentence, with its evidence in the next.

Prompt 09 · Measure

Customer Journey and A/B Test Plan: How Verity Used It

What Verity brought · Head of Growth

“Traffic is fine, demos are fine, and revenue is down.”

What the prompt returned

“Credibility. Demo-to-opportunity fell 44% to 26%. $2.1M a quarter.”

Reach
not the constraint
Relevance
not the constraint
Comprehension
not the constraint
Credibility
THE BINDING CONSTRAINT

Takeaway: spend on proof, such as case studies and audit results, instead of on more traffic.

The analysis · Verity loses sales because buyers do not believe its main claim

Customer journey analysis examines each stage from first contact to purchase to find the binding constraint: the stage that limits results the most. The stages checked are reach, relevance, comprehension, credibility, friction and fit.

  • The constraint: credibility. Demo-to-opportunity conversion fell from 44% to 26% because the website offers no proof of Verity’s main claim.
  • The cost: $2.1M of pipeline lost every quarter.
  • Test design: the fix is tested with one change, a minimum improvement worth acting on, enough traffic for a reliable result, and stop criteria agreed before the test starts.

Prompt 10 · Guidelines

Brand Guidelines: How Verity Used It

What Verity brought · Head of Marketing

“Every freelancer we hire writes something slightly off-brand.”

What the prompt returned

“Three pages. Who we are for, what we claim, and what we never say.”

Who it is for
and who it is deliberately not for
The one difference
with its proof attached
Never say
“engaging”, or any unproven claim
Review trigger
what makes this brief go stale

Takeaway: give every writer the three-page brief and the list of banned claims before they start work.

The analysis · Verity’s brand guidelines must fit on three pages

Brand guidelines are a short document that tells anyone creating content who the brand serves, what it claims and how it writes. Long strategy decks are rarely read by the freelancers and agencies who produce the work.

  • Content: the target customer and the customers it does not target, the point of difference with its proof, and the brand voice.
  • Brand rules: what the brand never says: “engaging”, any suggestion that a regulator approved the product, or a customer’s name without written permission.
  • Review triggers: events that require updating the brief, such as a competitor’s move, a new target segment or a product change.
The finished files · from prompts 05, 07 and 10

The Finished Files: Messaging Hierarchy, Campaign Brief and Brand Guidelines

Three documents from Verity’s ten prompts: the messaging hierarchy every team uses, the brief for the $180K Q3 campaign, and the brand guidelines given to every writer.

The training that produces the evidence your auditor asks for

One master message, three supporting points, and the proof beneath each

Verity · for every team
Publish only what is proven
Supporting pointProof status
Evidence by defaultPROVEN
Provable per person, per versionPROVEN
Survives the follow-up[NEEDS PROOF]
Proof, strongest first: measured results, named customers, third-party validation, demos, customer logos.

Q3 campaign: from “they are all the same” to “the evidence is the product”

Communication objective and creative brief

Verity · Q3
Budget $180K

Audience

Regulated companies with 200 to 800 employees and an audit finding in the last twelve months.

Objective

Comprehension, not awareness. Buyers already know Verity exists but do not understand how it differs.

They believe now

Compliance training is a box to tick, and every vendor is the same.

They must believe after

The training is not the deliverable. The evidence it produces is.

Master message: the training that produces the evidence your auditor asks for.
Failure test. The result that counts as failure is agreed and written down before the campaign runs, not after.

Verity brand guidelines

Three pages: who we are for, what we claim, and what we never say

Verity · for writers and agencies
Read before starting work

For

Regulated companies of 200 to 800 employees that have just had an audit finding.

Not for

Large enterprises, which build in-house, and companies under 50 employees, which are below the price floor.

The one difference

Audit-ready evidence. No competitor claims it, and it is proven.

Voice, in one example

Not “Unlock seamless, engaging compliance enablement for the modern workforce.” Instead: “Compliance training that hands your auditor the evidence, not a spreadsheet.”

Never say: “engaging”; any suggestion that a regulator approved the product; a customer’s name without written permission; any claim marked NEEDS PROOF.
Review triggers. A competitor’s move, a new target segment or a product change means this document is updated.

Prompt output, formatted for this page. In Claude each prompt returns it as a finished Word or Excel file; other tools return the same content as text and tables. The figures come from whatever you paste in. Verity is fictional, so every number here is ours to show you.

Marketing AI Prompts: Frequently Asked Questions

Can ChatGPT write a positioning statement?

Yes. The positioning prompt picks the segment to win, names the ones you give up, and states your position against the competitors your buyers actually compare you with.

Can ChatGPT write marketing copy that does not sound like AI?

The brand voice prompt sets your voice as clear rules and runs a pass that strips out the tells of machine-written copy. The copy prompt then writes the page, the ads, the email and the posts, each line tied to your core message.

Which AI tools do the marketing prompts work with?

ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. In Claude, every prompt ends with a finished Word or Excel file. ChatGPT and Gemini return the same content as text and tables.

Do I have to run all ten prompts?

No. Each prompt works on its own. Run the one you need, such as the messaging prompt or the campaign brief, or run all ten in order for one brand.

Pack 3 · Marketing & Brand

Get the Marketing AI Prompt Pack

  • 10 marketing prompts, as a PDF and a plain-text file
  • Prompts for customer research, competitor analysis, segmentation and positioning
  • Prompts for the value proposition, messaging, brand voice and the campaign brief
  • Prompts for campaign copy, customer journey analysis, A/B tests and brand guidelines
  • A finished Word or Excel file from every prompt in Claude; works in ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini
  • A one-time price of $15, with lifetime updates
Next step · the AI PowerPoint generator

Turn the Finished Documents into a Board Presentation

Paste the pack’s documents into the AI PowerPoint generator, a separate product at $19, and Claude builds the board presentation as a real .pptx file with editable PowerPoint charts.

Below is Verity’s, twelve slides, unedited.

Verity positioning deck, slide 1 of 12 Verity positioning deck, slide 2 of 12 Verity positioning deck, slide 3 of 12 Verity positioning deck, slide 4 of 12 Verity positioning deck, slide 5 of 12 Verity positioning deck, slide 6 of 12 Verity positioning deck, slide 7 of 12 Verity positioning deck, slide 8 of 12 Verity positioning deck, slide 9 of 12 Verity positioning deck, slide 10 of 12 Verity positioning deck, slide 11 of 12 Verity positioning deck, slide 12 of 12
1 / 12

Verity is a fictional company, so every number here is ours to show you. Generated in the NOVA house style.

Microsoft PowerPoint Want the presentation built for you? The AI PowerPoint Generator — $19

Built in Claude as a real .pptx file with editable charts. Or take both generators together in the bundle, $25.

More AI Prompts for Work

Nine packs for work, from strategy and finance to sales, HR and operations, each written to the same standard with its own worked example.